ScotusCrim is a recurring series by Rory Little focusing on intersections between the Supreme Court and criminal law. The first sentence of Article II of the Constitution introduces the executive […] ...

Sen. Rand Paul confronted Sen. Markwayne Mullin during his confirmation hearing to lead Trump's Department of Homeland Security for comments appearing to justify a 2017 attack against him, and then ...

When the Confederation of African Football (CAF) invoked Article 84 to overturn the 2025 Africa Cup of Nations final, it did ...

President Trump is likely to make less of an impact on the federal bench in his second term because of fewer vacancies, a ...

That concept lies at the heart of the striking opinion by Chief Judge James Boasberg of the federal district court in Washington, which quashed the Trump administration’s subpoenas aimed at Federal ...

Empirical SCOTUS is a recurring series by Adam Feldman that looks at Supreme Court data, primarily in the form of opinions and oral arguments, to provide insights into the justices’ decision making ...

As restaurants cite rising commercial LPG costs for the surcharge, here is what Indian law permits and where it draws a clear ...

A handful of judges on Colorado's second-highest court are producing substantially more precedent-setting opinions than their colleagues, which create binding interpretations of the law that reach ...

There is no court precedent that could block Trump from declaring ‘fake news’ a national emergency. That’s why much is at ...

Judge Van Dyke’s dissent highlights controversial court rulings on gender and public safety in Washington state.

Judge Julie Goodman’s impeachment hearings are scheduled to begin Monday at 9 a.m. in the Capitol Annex building.

Lawyers warn that the ongoing suspension, effectively stripping her of a lifetime term as circuit judge, sets a dangerous precedent.