Panama’s response has been strategically sophisticated. Amb. Eloy Alfaro formally invoked UN Charter Article 2 (4) ...

Potential plans range from partnering more closely with Panamanian security forces to a less likely option of U.S. troops' ...

Trump and his team are right to recognize Panama’s strategic importance, but they are wrong in how they are approaching the ...

Any move by a foreign power to take the canal by force would almost certainly violate international law. The U.S. and Panama ...

The US completed construction of the canal in the early 20th century but signed treaties handing it over to Panama in 1977 in response to political pressure and unrest in Panama over US ownership.

(MENAFN- The Rio Times) The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) has reaffirmed its unwavering compliance with the "Treaty Concerning the Permanent Neutrality and Operation of the Panama Canal ...

Washington relinquished control of the waterway to Panama on Dec. 31, 1999, under a treaty signed in 1977 by President Jimmy Carter. Mr. Trump has claimed that Carter "foolishly" gave the canal away.

before the Carter Administration negotiated its handover to Panama in a controversial treaty opposed by many Republicans at the time.The 51-mile canal is a key to both the movement of ...

The U.S. completed construction of the canal in the early 20th century but signed treaties handing it over to Panama in 1977 in response to political pressure and unrest in Panama over U.S. ownership.